Over the past year, protests have roiled, and at times shut down, America’s college campuses.
Student groups with distinct political and cultural viewpoints have clashed, finding ever new ways to antagonize each other.
And outside agitators from left and right have attempted to capitalize on the divide.
Higher education leaders have struggled to communicate with students seeking ways to advocate for changes in local and state policy, critique international conflicts and change operations at their colleges and universities.
At the University of Utah, the Bennion Center for Community Engagement has hired Josh Shulruff, Campus Dialogue Program manager, to venture where others fear to tread.
“After experiencing many conflicts on campus last year, it became clear that more support regarding constructive dialogue was needed on our campus,” said Jason Ramirez, dean of students.
Shulruff comes to the U from James Madison University, where he worked for eight years at the university’s Community Engagement and Volunteer Center, helping students learn how to engage in advocacy—write letters to members of Congress, organize their communities and participate in service. The experience, he said, helped him understand the strong sense of social justice and inclination toward advocacy that motivated many college students today. Their passion coincides with a point in U.S. history defined by political division and displacement.
“This feels cliché saying it, but I think we’re at a moment of crisis in our democracy,” Shulruff said. “That crisis has reflected in a lot of our institutions, including higher education. And I think that universities in some ways are best positioned to do something about it.
“I want my efforts to be focused on making our democracy function a little better,” he added. “I believe the leadership and skills students learn will ripple out in a way that will make our democracy healthier.”
Shulruff’s role coincides with other efforts to encourage lawful free expression on campus, including President Taylor Randall’s Viewpoint Representation and Expression Task Force, Student Affairs’ work with the Constructive Dialogue Institute and a new set of online training available to campus community members this fall called “Perspectives.”
“Free speech and all legal expressions of diverse viewpoints are part of our educational mission,” Ramirez added. “By creating this role, and pairing it with efforts to support and protect free expression, I believe we are taking a step toward further supporting our community's right to speech, demonstration, and activism.”
We asked Shulruff about how he will approach student groups exercising their free speech rights on campus.
I absolutely believe that students who are engaging in activism are creating educational experiences for themselves and the rest of us. I see my role as providing some scaffolding for those actions—making sure students are fully informed about policies and the law.
I don’t think that any student owes me trust, from the get-go. I want to figure out ways to actually build relationships with students and earn whatever level of trust they’re willing to give me. That means offering resources when I have them, and finding moments where I can be useful. There may be student groups who are so distrustful of the university and administration at this point, they don’t want to talk to me. Ultimately, they are in charge of their education and their strategic decisions.
I do hope that students know my role is not to report to the Dean of Students. I am outside of Public Safety. So I’m neither involved in student conduct or law enforcement, and students can tell me as much or as little as they want in terms of what they’re thinking, how they’re planning. If students ask me a question, it’s my job to make sure I give them correct information and connect them to the information or resources they need to engage responsibly in advocacy and free speech—regardless of their message, their cause, or the action they’re considering.
I’m not qualified to give legal advice. I don’t think I was hired because I have tremendous expertise in law and policy. I hope people selected me because they thought I’d be successful in building a bridge to students.
I do think that, generationally, college students today are much more attuned to the ways speech can negatively impact people. It’s fine to say, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me.” But that is not true. We devalue the true power of speech when we take that approach.
There are really admirable trends apparent in the current generation of students at U.S. colleges and universities as they teach us to take language seriously and recognize that not everyone has born the burden of hateful speech equally. And not everyone has had the ability to respond to speech equally. What’s sometimes been lost, though, is the sense that we’re protecting our own rights when we tolerate speech we find hateful. You see it on all sides: Like when student groups on other campuses shout down Israeli guest speakers. At the same time, others are trying to stop them from chanting, “From the river to the sea.” It’s something I hope to talk about with students here!
Many student groups are receiving support and mentorship from state and national organizations. The university is not separate from the broader community around us. We’re far more interconnected than we acknowledge sometimes. If there are relationships that I can build with those outside groups that would be helpful to University of Utah students, I want to do that.
Efforts like DART are emerging across higher ed, and so I’ve been reaching out to colleagues at our peer institutions. If other folks have found things that work to make these conflicts healthier on their campuses, then I want to steal those ideas. There are also lots of dialogue models and initiatives being used across the country, so I’m working to make sure I stay up to speed on that work and that our work is part of that conversation.
While I will be based in the Bennion Center, I will coordinate a group of interdisciplinary advisors from across campus--the Demonstration and Activity Resource Team (DART).
DART members will include student, faculty and staff representatives from the Center for Campus Wellness, Registrar’s Office, University of Utah Police Department, among others. They will meet quarterly and as issues come up. It will be a way to bring useful perspectives and information together—sometimes quickly.
I’m hoping we will be able to fill in some of the information, communication and education gaps that may exist as we try to engage with students. This group can help our community navigate the many different policies, procedures, and laws that often can serve as perceived barriers to speech.
Every member of the team will do outreach. That’s especially important for student members of the team; they may have greater success talking to students than other members might. We have to consider all possible bridges to communication.
I don’t only want to be speaking to people who are already very active. I would really love to meet any student or group that would like to be doing more organizing or advocacy, but haven’t had the information or resources to get started. If there are opportunities for me to support them, I want to be there.
It is my job, and my intention, to share the same resources and information to everyone, regardless of their viewpoints or the causes they are advocating for.
I don’t see success for me in terms of the idea that students will never be arrested on campus again. If a student really wants to get arrested, they’re going to be able to do that. And if a student really feels like that’s a significant tactic for creating change, it’s not within my power to stop them from making that choice.
I do think I can strive to make sure that no one gets arrested who doesn’t plan to. That would be one measure of success for me.